본문 바로가기

잡동사니/Japan Fukushima radioactivity

[Japan radiation] Reference value agricultural products less radiation is safe? It is a lie.

This article gimikjung Professor (Dongguk University professor) is based on the lectures. View full minute lecture, please go to the link. Fukushima dining table since we safe? 


Radiation exposure and cancer is very closely related. In other words, danghamyeon radiation exposure increases the probability of cancer. medical conclusion "is directly proportional to the radiation exposure and cancer." In other words, cancer radiation exposure radiation to safe twenty (zero) should be If even a little exposure to radiation increases the likelihood of cancer.  


Radiation exposure of the radioactive material that is affected.

Radioactive radiation exposure affected the amount of radioactive material says.


Thus, less than the government standard set by the radiation safe food because the claim is a lie. Granted that less than standard even if radiation is detected will unsafe.


Korea, Japan radiation standard for the agricultural food stories


Originally for food  in Korea and Japan  the radioactive standard 370 Bq / Kg (370 becquerels / kg), respectively. Since the Fukushima accident in Japan 500 standards becquerels / kg of improved. Based on 500 and 499, all food distribution was less. 499 radiation levels and radiation levels in a safe food comes out the 501 hazardous food is radioactive.


One day, one year after the enforcement of Japan lowered its standards 100. Be detected by more than 500 basis because there was no food distribution is limited. Until yesterday, suddenly changed for standard radiation safe food which was followed by 450 from one day to four times more than standard radiation is turned into food.


Radiation levels safe food must be zero, and this one even comes hazardous food is radioactive.


Japan radiation standard to 100 natchuja South Korea for the Japanese food standard was lowered to 100. I'm radioactive spill accident in Japan is 100, that are not based on the standard of Korea may be due to more than 370 being. But the funny thing Domestic Korea, China, Japan, USA, etc., still radioactive acid 370 non-food standards are being applied. Japan, radioactive contamination exceeds acid per 100 domestic and Chinese food, and the food safety of radiation is less than 370. 


KHNP employees and officials, including the radioactive standard associated with nuclear power is only shame people arbitrarily. This is based on medically proven. Meanwhile, papers relating to the safety of radiation there. 



Eating food that is in accordance with the same criteria producer 100370 What other means do so? Radioactive standard is expected to mean that it is safe will be?  radiation that a standard could be considered on the basis of safety? Radiation is not to say that it is a safety standard. 


Refrigeration is produced in Japan Pollack, frozen mackerel, parrot fish bow, bow defense, radioactive contamination, including chilled cod between 0.5 to 25 have been identified. most polluted that was a lot of activity is less than 25. If so, the current standard set by South Korea and Japan is less than 100 figures, claiming that it is secure and is on the market. Fish caught in nearby Fukushima standard will be safe, especially if you have less than 100.


Radiation exposure and cancer relevance of the  graph that represents the following: This graph associated with radiation exposure and cancer synthesis of various studies are based on data drawn will. In other words,  the number because it is a study of ten million people in the world are said to accept as dogma. slightly even when exposed to radiation and will increase the probability of cancer.



That there is more than one line on the graph, depending on the type of cancer, the probability is because I'm different. Anyway, when exposed to radiation increases the chance of any cancer or have already discovered the fact that it is called. For true knowledge, anyone know it?


The problem is in the middle dotted line dating. The dotted line until a certain level of exposure from claims that even if the home is okay by the theory that the system is Hormesis. 


Home systems theory (Prof. JK announced - Nuclear Engineering, Hanyang University)

- In the low-dose (a small amount of radiation exposure) does not increase cancer occur for other reasons, but rather to suppress cancer claims give.


Professor of System Theory for home gimikjung objections

- No human data are mainly the study of the cellular level.

- USA nucleic industry organized by the enormous funds. Theory.

- The theory is bogus does not receive international recognition.



Tag  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , ,  ,  ,