AP Matsuyama, Japan, the nuclear policy expert and professor at the University of jangjeonguk Japan radiation problem by connecting the phone to a comment I've heard about.
The strange thing is true in the online article, but open questions, and professor of jangjeonguk presented in the body of the article did not answer. It's absolutely amazing that the answer is that it? Answer this much too difficult for timely online articles in the body do?
Then, the viscosity, but these days not so good as the interview in a difficult media environment exported to broadcast AP would like to give a compliment.
So I left it blank and I have compiled the answers jangjeonguk professor. Omgiryeogo tried as possible. If there is ever wrong, please point out in the comments.
Those who know know details were a matter of course, but if you think rationally, to hear expert to talk about the South gamhoe different. Talk about this right in rinara nuclear experts told not to talk to anyone because the mean.
In an interview today, learned new and surprising stories from the Fukushima area mountain river is flowing towards the east coast of the country, and through the river of radiation contaminated water to the East Coast for more than two years went by the story.
Radioactive materials such as cesium is already flowing to the East Coast went 2 years in Korea in the East Coast also slightly radioactive contamination, such as cesium-137 and can be had. Terrible. Domestic fishery also will need a thorough examination of radioactivity. Also mean lowering standards to less than 100.
Now working in the domestic nuclear experts was time to reveal the truth, and I think the view.
Silent and difficult to see that there is nothing wrong with you that you need to think. scholarly conscience Is not it?
Of course, argue that unconditional security, rather than actively only mean better.
[News No. 1] in Japan leaked radioactive contaminated water into the sea ... Korean influence
<Dial-up connection: Japan, Matsuyama University Professor jangjeonguk>
Japan Fukushima nuclear power plant to go offshore spills of radioactive contamination as the fact that the shock is revealed.
It was a day I'd like 300 tons.
The Japanese government has a standard low-polluted water flowing into the sea, though even considering sending and became known as a voice of concern is increasing.
Nuclear policy expert at the University of Matsuyama, Japan jangjeonguk For detailed situation will connect faculty.
<Q 1> Japan at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant leaked radioactive contamination, and that number continues to spill into the sea represented himself in the end I do Japanese. In fact, the number of marine pollution from runoff problems Seas immediately after the accident? How TEPCO, which had continued to deny this time to admit marine spill happened?
<Jangjeonguk Professor (Nuclear policy expert)> Japanese government around 300 tons goes into the polluted waters in the state that was admitted on August 7. Japan to restart nuclear power plants are screening. Japanese people have a severe backlash. In this situation, if the number of pollution continue (to the sea) flowing to the people on the sidelines when the backlash (nuclear power plants) is to restart the anxiety and fear that can think.
<Q 2> Meanwhile, TEPCO can manage the pollution been going to do? Marine waters and to prevent leakage into the ground near the wall I'm aware of that accumulated. What's going on disclosure?
<Jangjeonguk Professor (Nuclear policy expert)> The wall is a temporary shards. Spikes in the ocean plate, underground at a depth of 30 meters to 800 meters around the wall is making. Gonna be completed next September. Now the number of polluted runoff before it temporarily be found to be about 100 meters across the beach to spend the yongjeon have firm ground. Just because the land was chayeo groundwater pathway was the water level goes up. That the wall is a special wall 1.8 m from the ground up to be able to make available. I'm creating a wall than it is deep. As water levels rise beyond 1.8 meters as happened to flow into the sea. Now the earth Makes about 1.4 kilometers make it into ice and the future plan. I'm not making it.
<Question 3> Japanese government about 300 tons a day, says leaked sees that I'm. In the eyes of professors about? If the extent of about 300 tons going? Degree of contamination of the sea right? How about?
<Jangjeonguk Professor (Nuclear policy expert)> I do not know how much the sea, but the Fukushima ocean and inland, there are offshore. Inland'm a breakwater. He said to contamination in the range of ish enough.
<Question 4> is still around nuclear power plants every day, I'd like jungyirago million tons of groundwater inflow. Then all of the groundwater contamination that going to look?
<Jangjeonguk Professor (Nuclear policy expert)> one, mountain side (every day) for one thousand tons of the nuclear power plant under construction is coming. Coming into the building under 400 tons, and the remaining 600 tons of the 300 tons of pollution into the sea from the state is not entered, the remaining 300 tons of contaminated land around it over (to radiation) pollution enters the ocean be announced ( claims) is. (Coming from the mountains of one thousand tons) 600 tons (by sea) deuleoganeunde 300 tons of contamination was not reported in the state is hopeful that the government of Japan.
<Question 5> Treatment of nuclear contamination of the original How do you made?
<Jangjeonguk Professor (Nuclear policy expert)> be the original groundwater contamination using a special device, such as a filter removed, but after the accident in Japan put a tremendous amount of water and working on it. Then new water holes have piled up in the basement is more than 70,000 tons. The (radioactive) water mixed with sea salt because one is removed, to remove radioactive material such as cesium, and you've been saving. To store the tank There are currently around 360,000 t 320,000 t'm a bit car I have very little storage. Soon (the number of radioactive contamination) will run out of places to store.
<Question 6> The Japanese government a little lower in the polluted water, polluted water standard seems to think it's okay. This right are you talking about?
<Jangjeonguk Professor (Nuclear policy expert)> is the worst case. Even if lower than the standard baseline set by the government on management standard, not everything is safe, is not standard. In the worst case, because there is no place to keep a will shed into the sea.
<Q 7> How do you see this situation, Professor? Should are serious? If the number of pollution continues to be leaked so happen be on?
<Jangjeonguk Professor (Nuclear policy expert)> sea itself becomes contaminated ... They do not absorb fish? Of fish in the food chain by being included in more and larger fish (large fish radioactive materials) being absorbed, in the end finally comes into the human body did that.
<Question 8> How about the atmosphere of Japan? This polluted runoff waters showing the Japanese people have a reaction? And fish to evade Do not happening?
<Jangjeonguk Professor (Nuclear policy expert)> that still does not sound right. Because, residents and retailers to purchase the instrument and the government is more stringent than the reference value.
<Question 9> Japanese government is preparing are aware that you are struggling. The number of radioactive contamination flowing into the sea there any way to prevent lift?
<Jangjeonguk Professor (Nuclear policy expert)> Japanese government in the next two years which takes time, planning and land ice'm a. Itself ... So far, about 1.4 km of humans on a large scale cases are frozen to the ground. So you can not be 100% guaranteed. And I'm thinking nuclear fuel nuclear fuel from nuclear power plants in the ground to take out any underground building is demolished, unless the (radiation contaminated groundwater to the sea) will continue to flow.
<Question 10> country is also a little worried about radiation. You (radioactivity) the number of polluted runoff would not have an impact as the country finally takes this idea. The degree of this section are likely?
<Jangjeonguk Professor (Nuclear policy expert)> Cause one fish roam. Can not influence at all, do we? Currently second in the country (radioactive) concern that the tide come in and you're gonna do. East Coast is already coming in pantry. After the accident I'm coming from. Tara cities across the east coast of Japan has sneakers. Two large rivers flowing into the city, I'm next. Fukushima is the upstream of the river. Mountain side south of Fukushima radioactive materials through the rain, the river did come up through the East Coast. Already (East Coast radioactive river) are coming.
<Question 12> I'm becoming increasingly serious problem. Korean civic groups also raised the question of standard of radiation and am. If you really like the general public at the table, what (should) I could be safe from radiation, and I'm contemplating. In the eyes of professors about?
<Jangjeonguk Professor (Nuclear policy expert)> Once the government is lowered, the current standard. 370 domestic and imported food from Japan and I'd like hanhaeseoneun lowered to 100. Japan, South Korea and the same 370 degrees until last year was lowered to 100 from last year. Food and infants, and the stronger the lower half of the state is 50, why is the 370 domestic food imported from Japan 100 is a good thing I do not understand. There is no guarantee that 100 yiraseo safety. Therefore, the exact number of citizens and public citizens decide to purchase anhalji hagekkeum think you need to pass the correct knowledge is.
So far, Japan, Matsuyama University jangjeonguk was a professor.
View Videos
http://tvpot.daum.net/v/v36b1GxAZQTQTTgVyHebTZG
See original article
http://media.daum.net/foreign/others/newsview?newsid=20130809180805557
Tag Sea radiation influx , radioactive ocean pollution , nuclear expert interviews , Japan, Matsuyama University , Japan Radiation , Japan Fukushima , Professor jangjeonguk